† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P worth regarding Wald statistic to check to own an overall total effect away from categorical BI-RADS thickness. The analytical testing was in fact two-sided.
Regardless if BI-RADS thickness failed to customize likelihood of cancer of the breast passing during the link to other pathological points, people with BI-RADS step 1 thickness tended to have the high risk, in every stratum
¶ AJCC phase is included while the a great categorical covariate in the activities that have most of the amounts mutual, with and you may in place of phase IV.
Success design results for new family members ranging from mammographic density and you may exposure off cancer of the breast demise, full by AJCC stage*
* AJCC = Western Combined Panel on Cancers; BI-RADS = Nipple Imaging Reporting and you can Study System; Bmi = bmi; CI = trust period; Time = possibility proportion. N = 96 ladies excluded throughout the result in-specific habits.
† Without and with adjustment for BMI. Simple adjusted includes covariates for registry site (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), with and without BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ).
‡ Fully adjusted model includes covariates for registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of hater mobile diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), BMI (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded.
§ P really worth from Wald statistic to test having an overall total feeling out of categorical BI-RADS occurrence. All the mathematical screening was indeed a couple of-sided.
Even when BI-RADS density failed to modify likelihood of cancer of the breast dying inside relationship to almost every other pathological activities, people having BI-RADS step one thickness had a tendency to have the high chance, in any stratum
¶ AJCC phase is included just like the an excellent categorical covariate for the activities with every grade mutual, which have and you may without phase IV.
One of women having tumors of at least dos.0cm, BI-RADS step one density is associated with an elevated chance of breast cancer demise (Time = step 1.55, 95% CI = step 1.fourteen in order to dos.09; P = .003 to have total effect of BI-RADS density; Dining table 4). Women who got each other BI-RADS step one thickness and you can large-degrees tumors had a greater likelihood of breast cancer passing (Hour = step 1.forty-five, 95% CI = 1.05 in order to dos.02; P = .thirteen to possess full effectation of density).
Success design outcomes for the brand new family relations between mammographic occurrence and you will chance out of breast cancer passing, stratified by the tumefaction attributes, AJCC level We–IV shared*
* N = 96 women excluded from cause-specific models. Fully adjusted model includes covariates for AJCC stage (I, IIA, IIB, III, IV), registry (five sites), age at diagnosis (30–44, 45–49, 50–54, 55–59, 60–64, 65–69, 70–74, 75–79, ?80 years), year of diagnosis (1996–1998, 1999–2001, 2002–2003, 2004–2005), body mass index (18.5 – <25, 25 – <30, ?30kg/m 2 ), mode of detection (screen-detected, interval-detected, other screen, clinically detected, other), surgery/radiation (no breast surgery, breast conserving therapy without radiation, breast conserving therapy with radiation, other surgery), chemotherapy (yes/no), and annual median income (<$42 000, $42 000 – <$52 000, $52 000 – <$66 000, ?$66 000). Women with missing covariate information were excluded. AJCC = American Joint Committee on Cancer; BI-RADS = Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System; CI = confidence interval; ER = estrogen receptor; HR = hazard ratio; PR = progesterone receptor.